Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Apply for Membership

Categories

Please refrain from copy and pasting messages over and over and over, or you will be removed from the forum. We all have input to make so let's keep this at a discussion and not a text block of commercials. Here are some helpful guidelines for good discussion and debate recommended by one of our members:

  • * Stay on topic
  • * Be clear
  • * Build upon your points and address those of other people
  • * Refrain from making assumptions about others' unstated views
  • * If you disagree with somebody, do so politely
  • * Clarify your terms and seek to understand others' (but avoid semantic derails)
Note: The opinions expressed by the moderators and members of this discussion board do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Occupy Together or Occupy Wall St. In the spirit of free information, open discussion, and the freedom of expression, members are able to speak about issues relating and directly pertaining to the Occupy movement. You will be banned for hate speech or intentional misinformation and please refrain from any violent rhetoric; this is a peaceful movement. Thank you.
Class War Politics
  • statusquobuster October 2011 +1 -1
    Class War Winner

    Joel S. Hirschhorn

    Much is being said by Republicans about a class war being waged by President Obama and Democrats. In their fantasy world this class war is attacking so called job creators. All this talk is pure nonsense, absolutely false and misleading, intentional political garbage designed to intentionally mislead gullible Americans stupid enough to believe the lies. Here is the truth: There has, indeed, been a class war waged in the US; it has been going on for a good thirty years. And this real war has been won.

    There are official data over time called the Gini index or coefficient between zero and one that is a statistical measure of economic inequality. When it is zero national income is evenly distributed among all citizens, and when it is one all the income goes to one person. Obviously the Gini figure will be somewhere between zero and one. Some nations have very low values and others very high ones. In the high category is the US. But more important is that the index has changed over time, rising from about 1980 to current times, after it had remained fairly stable over several decades. That significant rise from about .37 to .45 shows unequivocally that the rich got richer as most of the population in the middle class and below lost ground.

    To truly appreciate what has happened you must seriously examine some data. For example, between 1979 and 2005 the inflation-adjusted income of families in the middle of the income distribution rose 21 percent. That is very slow growth, especially compared with the 100 percent rise in median income over a generation after World War II when inequality actually decreased. More importantly, over the same period, the income of the very rich, the top 100th of 1 percent of the income distribution, rose by 480 percent. Absorb that number for a few moments. In 2005 dollars, the average annual income of that group rose from $4.2 million to $24.3 million. Those numbers describe the true class war in which the rich and powerful were the clear winner.

    Presently, according to new estimates by the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, one-fourth of those with incomes of more than $1 million a year pay income and payroll tax of 12.6 percent of their income or less, putting their tax burden below that of many in the middle class who are likely pay twice that amount or even more. The class war winners are clear.

    Need more convincing? Consider data from the Tax Foundation. Between 1987 and 2008, the share of income controlled by the top 1 percent grew to 20 percent from 12 percent. That equates to a total share growth of 67 percent. During the same period, their share of taxes went to 28 percent from 24 percent, indicating a share growth of 17 percent. Follow that? The top 1 percent share of income grew nearly five times faster than their share of taxes: 67 percent versus 17 percent. Pretty darn good deal. So forget all that malarkey from Republicans that the rich pay so much of the nation’s taxes unfairly. The class war winners are reaping the rewards of a two-party plutocracy that they own.

    Here is another dose of class war reality. The top 1 percent share of total pre-tax income rose from about 10 percent in 1980 to 21 percent in 2008, a nice doubling that helps explain the rise in economic inequality. It really pays to win the class war.

    The idea that raising taxes on the rich in these dismal economic times in any way represents some injustice is such baloney that one should wonder how any American can possibly eat this Republican garbage. Similarly, the nonsense about job creators somehow not creating new jobs because of higher taxes flies in the face of reality, because very low taxes have not caused them to create significant new jobs. Nor did higher taxes for some decades for decades after World War II stop high rates of new job creation.

    The rich class own most of the wealth of the nation after winning the class war for some thirty years. They accomplished this victory by using money to buy and corrupt the political system. The most perplexing aspect of all this is why most Americans have not risen up in revolt against the political system that has so screwed them. Those on the right keep supporting Republican candidates that lie to them and actively work against the economic interests of all but the rich. Those on the left fall victim to the lies of Obama and other Democrats that promise much but deliver next to nothing to bring economic justice to most Americans. Democrats have also contributed to the killing of the middle class.

    Odds are that those who have lost the real class war will continue to suffer until they wake up to the need to overthrow the political system. The only peaceful strategy being use of the Article V convention option in the Constitution by which state delegates could propose amendments that would reform the political and government system to take away the power used by the rich to steal the wealth of the nation. Do not ever believe that voting for new Democrats or Republicans will fix our corrupt and dysfunctional system.

    One important thing to keep in mind: Raising taxes on the rich is necessary but not sufficient to turn the class war already won by the rich around.

    Finally, the path to economic justice must include what Dylan Ratigan is advocating, a constitutional amendment to get money out of politics, which I urge readers to support. This is the way to remove the key tool used by the rich and powerful to pervert the economy in their favor. Congress will never propose such an amendment, only a convention will.

    [Contact Joel S. Hirschhorn through delusionaldemocracy.com.]
  • tlantz October 2011 +1 -1
    I am new to this site, but have very much enjoyed your discussion. Unfortunately it seems that no one is looking beyond the surface and that what we are experiencing now has been heading in this direction since the Civil War-with the same names creating the manipulations. If I can figure out how to do it I will post my findings somewhere here.
  • Gambino October 2011 +1 -1
    Joel,
    Great points. I agree with your summation of the data points. The problem is not just getting that information out there, but doing the marketing on that information to educate the sheep. There are now too many people that believe the message that the president is engaged in class warfare. Apparently, those people are only capable of learning sound bite messages and not researching the data for themselved.

    I agree that a constitutional ammendment is the only fix at this time to resolve several of the key underlying fundamentals. We must reform taxation, we need to remove the corpioration as being defined as a human being or citizen, we need campaign finance reform and we need to take back the control of our government.

    I disagree with some of the language in the Ratigan proposal because it seems to be a bit too loose in the corporation, non-profit, pac area, but I am squarely behind the effort.
    Check out this site someone else mentioned. http://movetoamend.org/

    Also, here is a good watch on the history of democracy.


  • Janko October 2011 +1 -1
    I suppose this fellow disagrees with you.



    But basicly he is right. Capitalism puts out tender to death.
  • gavemehope October 2011 +1 -1
    Very, nicely done status, loaded with great info, thank you for the education, and I think the rich have almost won the war, unless we do something now. Please keep educating. They will totally. Good thing some brave people camped out at Wall Street. I too support DR s getmoneyout.com campaign.
    @gambino will check out move to amend, have not seen that. Sounds like you have some valid concerns about language. If so please offer them to his site, it is open to suggestion, and we can use all the help we can get at all fronts .
  • Evolution101 October 2011 +1 -1
    Class warfare has been going on since the beginning of civilization; and is still going on today; anyone who doesn't believe in ( 1person 1vote; Union Of Equals; Democracy) : is waging class warfare.
  • marrand October 2011 +1 -1
    @statusquobuster: you are peddling your own politics in what I thought was not a political forum. You are trying to make a case for Obama and his liberals to take over this movement. One reason we are succeeding so far is because the movement focuses on specific ills (like banks hurting the people) and has not taken sides in the democratic/republican debate. Once they do, as you seem to want them to do, the movement will shrink.

    You think you present all kinds numbers and conclusions and decide you have proven your point. Well, I have bad news for you: at least 40% of our population, many of whom experienced, educated, brilliant and certainly caring and idealistic people think the exact opposite. Only they don't push their case as blatantly as you just did. That kind of pushing is up to politicians, like Obama and Republican candidates and the corresponding office holders.

    Some people say "educate the sheep". Who are the educators and who are the sheep? Who decides that someone is not fit to think and must adhere to a set of spoon fed principles? Just because a person doesn't agree with Obama's message does not mean he/she is sheep. Or does the movement believe otherwise? If so, then let's be honest: openly align ourselves with him whom many believe in, and let the chips fall where they may. Do you honestly think this will help us?

    Sorry for sounding a little harsh; I was attracted to OWS because it was doing things I could relate to.