— é ÷ × —

I read a lot, and read and post on occupycafe.org and on this site, and I do interoccupy.org conference calls, and I am active in Sacramento's Occupy community. I feel confident in saying that misunderstandings of Marx, along with what women have written since World War 2, underlies a lot of our discussion. Both are extremely deep. Like a person who knows a little about a complicated machine, we know just enough to screw things up by preventing us from deciding on a winning plan. Thus I think Occupy can't focus on a winning plan because we aren't steeped in — not the class consciousness Marx — the physicist Marx. Consciousness is very tricky, more so than physics. A corollary of this is that we need to be steeped in feminist and womanist theory because I assert that women's feeding activity is the most primary physical thing about our existence. Following their thought also indicates that consciousness is very tricky. Both Marx, and feminist and womanist work, has a physics dimension and a consciousness dimension.

Womanist theory is about black women and other women who don't fit the mold of a privileged "white" feminist. But both ideas challenge conventional thinking. The question of how the creators of life (women) have become lessened in the eyes of those they create, thereby elevating men, implies a need to change our scientific historical and religious ideas. Thus a grounding in feminist and womanist theory would help prepare one for an active intellectual role in devising a new world system. The problem is that patriarchal ideas actually arose out of a world where women had higher status, and people receive little education in these areas. Feminist and womanist theory can be used to inform the education of future citizens concerned with the concerns of Occupy. The history of women are examples of everyday people doing things which a growing patriarchal system eventually hid. The power men gained during the Ice Ages when women had to depend on them for food, is still invested in men. Women haven't gotten it back yet. A physics of feeding would underly such a change. F=MA is a physics of male force. F=M/A is a physics of female feeding.

If Occupy enunciates the essential grievances of all people — though the details vary from region to region — it can work out the details once it gains the allegiance of all the people of the world, which feminist and womanist theory and feeding physics concur upon. Otherwise we use force physics at the behest of various patriarchal secular and sectarian and economic interest groups who have more to gain by fighting than by cooperating. The reason Occupy's "privileged" members can presume to speak with and work with the oppressed in other countries is because we have learned things that the world wants us to apply, through the United Nations.

The idea of a feeding physics, based on the innate feeding capacity of women and Earth, and connected to the logical mathematical variables of Newton, Marx, and California Native Indians, is introduced in the discussions here titled: "How to Disagree", "Evolution of Capitalism", "Global Debt Jubilee", "Wanting to Be Indian", "It Has to Start Somewhere", and "Strategy-Labor-Environment". I also put forward the feminist and womanist thesis that includes the feeding physics using Newton's, Marx's, and Indigenous variable in the discussion "Has Occupy Hit a Wall". In that last discussion I essentially said that all the isms, proposals, and ideas circulating in Occupy, and most importantly its O-C-C-U-P-Y in your face attitude, need to be put through a focusing lens that social physical and spiritual theory provides, once we get past patriarchy.

Law and science are based on observation and theory. For Occupy to win, its observations and its theory, its worldview (gone into below) must be the best and have the allegiance of all people. The one thing that can be imposed by us which doesn't give power to the top and which people will buy in to is having everyone being fed food. The mess governments have created is because law and science ignores the primacy of women. Yet we will have to convince many in Occupy that this is so. Feminist and womanist theory is about changing physics from force to feeding. Such avoids totalitarian accusations while it accomplishes the goal of ending greed and providing jobs.

The nascent USA, the colonists, rallied around Philidelphia. Philly today is trying to organize CoCs (Committes of Correspondence). Occupy may not be able to rally around them. Philly is held up deciding whether "leading functionaries" should be men or women, or a man and a woman. If we can't get past patriarchal observation and theory, — observation and theory being defined as a worldwide system of history/memory, science/learning, and religion/belief — and if we can't recognize that Aristotle and Newton ignored women, and if we can't recognize that indigenous people who the USA is still "genociding", have a superior system of thought, then Occupy will fail.

I am trying to weave a strategy so Occupy can win. Winning doesn't mean taking control of the world. But I think it should mean to take control of one thing, totally. That would be to feed everyone. Now I know this sounds odd. The idea of "ending world hunger" has been conceived more than once. Each nation should be able to control its on situation. So for me to advocate feeding everyone requires a lot of explanation. I will try to explain that this is not a argument for a "totalitarian" regime, or for a world dominated by the United Nations, or for people to lose civil and economic liberties

It involves a feeding physics that is different than Newton's force physics, yet it uses the same variables mass and acceleration, as in f=ma. It calculates the force of capital, which is food before it is anything else, though it turns in to many goods and services and in to money. I'm suggesting that women are the originators of feeding and food and thus capital, and that by altering Newton's equation, we can calculate exactly how to feed everyone. If Occupy had the power to do this, I suggest it would remove most causes for social conflict. I will continue explaining this bit by bit. Please see my other postings, as I look at various aspects of this strategy, which becomes a new education for us.

This is new for me although I started working on theory in the mid-80s. The 60s taught me that one becomes two and then becomes much more. That idea was hidden away in my mind. Once I encountered feminist and womanist theory, and was eventually led to economics, it occurred to me that the way to "end war" — I started on this mission at quite a young age — was to feed everyone. Awareness of women taught me that they are our primary feeders. So now I am developing a physics of feeding, a "feeding physics" to balance Newton's "force physics". And the theory and history I am spinning heavily involves what women have taught the world once societies began freeding them from the bondage a few hundred years ago. Having said that, its also true that women in some places have great freedom. I know this is controversial. Please join this discussion of how to use the strength and wisdom of women to solve world problems, to accomplish the "as yet unclarified" things that Occupy wants to do.